Today, on May 1, we celebrate – International Workers’ Day – which is a “celebration of labourers and the working classes” and keeps the hope alive that solidarity can prevail and together we can turn the ship around.
So raise our glasses!
People are closely watching the US data at present to see what the impacts of the recent tariff decisions by the new US President might have. I am no exception. Yesterday (April 30, 2025), the US Bureau of Economic Analysis published the latest US National Accounts figures – Gross Domestic Product, 1st Quarter 2025 (Advance Estimate) – which provides us with the first major data release since the new regime took office. The fact though is that this data cannot tell us much about the tariff decisions, given that Trump’s – Executive Order 14257 – only really became operational on April 4, 2025, although there had been some earlier tariff changes before then.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released the latest – Consumer Price Index, Australia – for the March-quarter 2025 today (April 30, 2025). The data showed that the inflation rate rose by 0.9 points in the quarter but over the 12 months was stable at 2.4 per cent . The inflation rate has been within the RBA’s inflation targeting range for the last 9 months and inflationary expectations are all within the range. There are no significant wage pressures evident. Using the RBA’s own logic, its policy interest rate should now be cut.
Soon after the US President announced – Liberation Day tariffs – I wrote this blog post – US government is pinning its tariff hopes on some unlikely to be realised assumptions (April 7, 2025) – to help readers understand what logic there was, if any, in the decision by the American government to impose wide-ranging and seemingly random tariffs on the rest of the world. The only apparent logic was that his advisors thought that while the tariffs would variously increase the US dollar price on final goods and services available to US consumers via imports, the flood of global investment funds into US treasury bonds, as a result of the heightened global uncertainty would push the US dollar up and offset the tariff impacts on import prices, because all foreign goods would now be cheaper. We now have a few weeks of data available to see whether things are turning out as Trump and his advisors thought. The definitive answer to date is that the opposite trends are emerging which will see the burden of the tariffs borne by the US consumers and producers rather than the presumption of the Administration that the burden would be pushed onto the rest of the world, which would precipitate rapid change in the favour of the US. It seems at present that an ‘own goal’ is being kicked – and – probably a lot of them.
Today, I am fully engaged in work commitments and so we have a guest blogger in the guise of Professor Scott Baum, who will soon be joining us at the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE) at the University of Newcastle as a senior research fellow. Scott has been one of my regular research colleagues over a long period of time and we currently hold ARC grant funding together to explore regional disparities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Scott indicated that he would like to contribute occasionally and that provides some diversity of voice although the focus remains on advancing our understanding of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and its applications. Today he is going to talk about the dilemma facing Australian voters who will go to the polls at next week’s federal election – the so-called Hobson’s choice facing voters all over the world.
It is a public holiday in Australia today and I decided that I would use the time, which is free of workplace-type interruptions, to work on a project that has an impending (very) deadline. I also did a podcast interview…
Dear Readers I apologise for the lack of connectivity over the last 36 hours or so. My research centre and related WWW pages are delivered by servers that we maintain within a larger data centre in Adelaide. On Wednesday evening…
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released the latest labour force data today (April 17, 2025) – Labour Force, Australia – for March 2025. It revealed that the unemployment rate rose 0.1 point (on rounding) to 4.1 per cent, employment rose by 32,200 (0.2 per cent), the underemployment rate was unchanged at 5.9 per cent, and the participation rate rose 0.1 point (on rounding). Monthly hours worked fell by 6 million (-0.3 per cent). The broad labour underutilisation rate (sum of unemployment and underemployment) was 9.9 per cent, which puts the claims that this is a tight labour market into perspective. There is substantial scope for more job creation given the slack that is present.
We know that after the Second World War, as nations embraced their major national policy statements (White Papers in many countries) to build their societies after the disruption of the War and the Great Depression, income inequality fell significantly. Since the 1970s, the post WW2 trend has been somewhat reversed in many (but not all) nations. The rising income inequality is particularly apparent in the Anglo advanced economies, with the US leading the way. In other nations, the trend is mixed, which suggests the link between rising income inequality and the rising support for right-wing political movements is less obvious than some commentators are suggesting. In fact, there is credible research that suggests the swing to right-wing political parties is not coming from the most precarious workers who appear to remain loyal to Leftist ideas. It is the next segment of workers up who have not yet been ravaged by globalisation but sense they are about to be who seem to have swung to the Right. In this blog post, I discuss some of these ideas and the research that is accompanying them.
It’s obviously becoming difficult to keep track of where the US government policy is on any particular day. Last week, it was ‘Liberation Day’, which included tariffs being imposed on remote penguin colonies in the back of nowhere, then Musk labelling the Trump’s trade adviser ‘dumber than a sack of bricks’, then tariffs on Chinese goods rising to 124 per cent (which will make then uncompetitive), then the ‘pause’ on reciprocal tariffs beyond the 10 per cent level … what will be next. These shifts and decisions are not exactly benign and the US Administration is displaying the sort of incompetence, capriciousness, flippancy – whatever you want to call it – that hardly befits the largest economic nation in the globe which has its tentacles spread far and wide. I was particularly interested though in the now infamous ‘Rose Garden Liberation Day’ speech Trump made last week (April 2, 2025) where he made claims about Japan, which were used to justify the imposition of 24 per cent tariffs on that nation. According to the President, Japan is among a host of countries that have “looted, pillaged, raped and plundered” the US. His evidence? None is available. The reality is that US cars don’t sell in Japan because they are inferior and ill-suited to the market. We explore that theme in this blog post.