Climate change issues including degrowth, deep adaptation

What the new British government needs to do to get the unions on side with climate action

The recent extreme weather in the northern hemisphere, the twin monster tropical storms in Japan, the impending shutdown of the – Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (Amoc) – among other happenings is telling us that things are changing for the worse. Clearly long-term weather trends are open to interpretation because the available data is sketchy the further one goes back. And, narratives from historians tell us that there have been rather extreme weather events in the past, which have led to many lost lives. The National Museum of Australia has an interesting information page – Heatwaves – which helps us understand the historical experience in Australia. There are other credible sites that deal with global events. However, the serial nature of the recent weather trends and the interlinked changes in the oceanic conditions, the cryosphere, rain and storms, and temperature allows us to counter the arguments that are presented to refute climate change science, which rely on claims that the current period is just part of a recurring cycle. These events are also relevant to the current political machinations in the UK, where Starmer is going (yay!) and the new probably PM is under fire from both business and unions for wanting to do something about climate change. In this post, I discuss what can be done.

Read more

Can capitalism survive? Not if we want to solve the climate and poverty crisis

The opening line of Part II of Joseph Schumpeter’s 1942 book – Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy – was “Can capitalism survive? No, I do not think it can”. His thesis was not that capitalism would perform badly, quite the opposite. Rather the considered that “its very success undermines the social institutions which protect it, and inevitably creates conditions in which it will not be able to live and which strongly points to socialism as the heir apparent.” The climate crisis facing the world is combining with the other outcomes of neoliberalism to create what is now called a poly crisis. Recently, a group associated with the United Nations Human Rights Council has released a – Roadmap for Eradicating Poverty Beyond Growth (published June 10, 2026) – which proposes a series of policy shifts designed to address aspects of the poly crisis. While it recognises that we must “escape the trap of growthism”, it fails to articulate that the fundamental logic of capitalism is capital accumulation that requires growth. To escape the trap, we must move beyond that mode of production. Merely tweaking policy structures within capitalism will not solve the problem.

Read more

Has the UAE seen the writing on the wall (peak oil that is)?

A lot of the post WW2 institutional structure is being challenged at present and/or vanishing altogether. Some of the changing environment will prove to be disastrous for the world, while some of the changes are likely to be beneficial. There will also be pro and con of many of the disruptions. Tomorrow (May 1, 2026), the United Arab Emirates (UEA) will formally leave the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), which many consider will mark the beginning of the end for the cartel that has shown at various times since it was established in 1960, that it can manipulate world oil prices to the advantage of cartel members. But OPEC has been in decline for many years and member states have been doing informally, what the UAE plans to do formally as a Non-OPEC, non-DoC member. The departure will have some negative impact on oil prices once the Iran mess ends. But the most significant aspect I think is that it marks the recognition by one of the largest oil producers that peak oil is past and they need to cash out their remaining reserves and invest in renewables before it is too late. If that is correct, and that sentiment catches on then positives might come from the decision in the medium-term.

Read more

Actions by our governments are the opposite to what we require from them on climate change

The US is now a rogue state. One example is the conduct of the US Health Secretary who has been working to destroy the scientific basis for health care since his appointment last year but exceeded his own hubris when he told a podcast on February 12, 2026 that “I’m not scared of a germ. I used to snort cocaine off of toilet seats.” This topped his statements about measles vaccination, nutritional design, and vaccination in general. I know it is real and serious but it is so outlandishly ignorant that it seems like a daily parody, as do the statements of the President, the Attorney-General and the rest of the cast. But I know it is serious. The most recent outrage is the decision to reverse the ‘endangerment finding’ that the Obama Administration used to justify its environmental legislation and regulative system. It is hard to understate the vandalism embodied by this decision and the ramifications extend across multiple sectors. The automobile manufacturing industry, for example, will now be free to produce more polluting cars and greenhouse gases. Cheaper, dirtier cars for Americans, and, goodbye to American cars (thank god) for the export market. But it is the rejection of the scientific research knowledge that is most astounding. As part of my degrowth project, I have been reading several recently published scientific reports on the topic of climate change. These are credible contributions to human knowledge, which are significantly at odds with the way in which the US is heading these days. I wonder when the Americans are going to realise their federal government has abandoned reason and is now posing as a terminal threat to their well-being.

Read more

Is there hope for a post neoliberal world?

I grew up in a society where collective will was at the forefront and it is true to say people looked out for each other. The state – at all levels – had various policy structures in place to provide levels of economic protection for the least advantaged members of society. Having grown up in a poor family, those structures were important in allowing me to stay at school and then go onto to university. It also allowed my friends on the housing commission estate (state housing) who had different skills (not academic) to get apprenticeships and build careers that gave them material security in that way. It wasn’t a perfect period – there was racism, misogyny, and xenophobia – but as mass education spread, my generation left a lot of that behind. I was thinking about that when I read the recent article by Robert Reich in the UK Guardian (December 29, 2026) – Americans are waking up. A grand reckoning awaits us – which carried a resonance of some of the things that I have seen emerge in Australia as well as this 4-decade or so neoliberal nightmare reaches some sort of denouement.

Read more

The achievement of a degrowth future requires system change not green new deals

When I was just coming into adulthood (1972), the – Club of Rome – published its famous – The Limits to Growth – which focused on the consequences of “exponential economic and population growth with a finite supply of resources”. It was a very influential research document generally, but also very important in shaping the way I would think about the world. The critics were many and the fossil fuel industry lobbying powerful and while the ideas did move policy makers somewhat and motivated new movements or gave impetus to existing bodies, such as the – Zero population growth – organisation, the vital message was largely ignored. Even the more recent green-oriented activism has not seen fit to focus on population growth as the primary problem that has to be addressed, if all the other problems of excessive energy use are to be dealt with effectively. Marxists were also very critical of the Club of Rome report for reasons that always escaped me. They criticised the Club’s focus on overpopulation, claiming it distracted us from the real problem, which was the voracious logic of the Capitalism system of production and accumulation. I always thought those attacks were unhelpful and allowed the progressive (Left) response to climate change to be fractured and, hence, weakened.

Read more

Terrestrial water storage capacity is declining fast and is hardly getting any attention

I read some disturbing research over the weekend about the rapidly declining terrestrial water storage (TWS) that is now becoming a global issue with drying regions linking up to form mega-drying areas that will be nearly impossible to reverse. While global warming gets a lot of attention in the media the surface water issue is not very well understood by the population, although it augurs devastation. I am working on a project at present that is focusing on new land use forms for the production of food and construction materials. The TWS problem is a central consideration in that it is being driven by poor land management and hopelessly inefficient and damaging agricultural practices, particularly those involved in producing animal protein. There are solutions but tell the next Greenie you meet tucking into some meat product that they have to stop eating that form of protein and see the reaction. That will tell you about how difficult it will be for societies to adapt and change.

Read more

Fiscal policy must be the tool of choice to respond to major climate related calamities – BIS

“Fiscal support can manage the direct economic fallout from extreme weather events.” That quote came from an interesting new research paper published in the 98th edition of the Bank of International Settlements Bulletin (February 10, 2025) – Macroeconomic impact of extreme weather events. The paper seeks to tease out what the economic impacts and policy implications are of the climate changes that are now manifest in various extreme weather events, such as droughts, wildfires, storms, and floods, which are increasing in incidence across the globe. The researchers recognise that such events are increasingly imposing “high economic costs” and “social hardship” on communities around the world. Their conjecture is that the “most extreme weather events have been rising and are likely to increase further” which will challenge policy makers. They discuss the implication of this increased exposure to such events for fiscal and monetary policy but recognise that fiscal policy must be the frontline tool to respond to the damage caused by such events.

Read more

The concept of degrowth remains underspecified – reform or revolution?

I have done quite a number of podcast interviews with various hosts over the last few weeks and the discussions often turn to issues relating to the environment and what Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) has to say about those issues. Inevitably, the discussions then meandered into debates about what is possible given that we humans are estimated to be using 1.7 times the regenerative capacity of our biosphere at present. At some unknown point, but sometime, that overuse will have to come to an end as the biosphere asserts its capacity constraints in one way or another. The question that seems to interest people now is whether the existing mode of production (Capitalism) is at all compatible with reducing that ratio. My answer is always the same. Those progressives who promote the notion of ‘green growth’, which is embedded in ‘green new deal’ proposals or their ilk, seem to think that we can make the shift away from fossil fuels and reduce the claim on the biosphere within a growth paradigm while retaining the Capitalist ownership relations. For me, a system where the logic is ever accumulation of capital via the creation and expropriation of surplus value and realisation of that value as profit, is incompatible with being able to live within the limits imposed by the biosphere. If we are to have any long-term future as a race, then we will have to embrace a degrowth strategy and radically alter the way we allocate resources and our patterns of production and consumption. In a sense, Marx’s long discredited notion of the – Tendency of the rate of profit to fall – as an intrinsic feature of Capitalism, which he believed would eventually bring the system asunder, is likely to be realised as the environmental constraints impinge on the accumulation system. Simply put, the logic of Capitalism requires growth and degrowth is the anathema of that logic.

Read more

COP29 another Cop Out by the world’s richest nations

Over the past week, I have already indicated that a major climate activist event was going on in Newcastle, Australia, which is the largest coal export port in the world. The event – The People’s Blockade – run by the activist group – Rising Tide, which involved thousands of people concerned about climate change gathering near the harbour and engaging. But it also involved protest flotilla’s launching into the shipping channel of the Port in an attempt to block the coal shipments. The cops were everywhere and were heavy handed acting under the imprimatur of the State government which tried to ban the festival but lost courtesy of a last minute Supreme Court ruling that declared the State’s attempt was illegal. At the same time as this grassroots event was unfolding, the elites of the world gathered in Baku (Azerbaijan) under the banner of the – UN Climate Change Conference (a.k.a. COP29) – which is the main global forum for addressing coordinated strategies for the resolution of climate change. The problem is that the talkfest is really just another cop out. Nothing much was achieved and the mainstream economics fictions were at the centre of this inaction – ‘fiscal space is limited’, ‘debt unsustainable’ and all the rest of the bunk, were rehearsed. And accepting the fiction that most nations can run out of their own currency, then steered the discussions to how private finance can be facilitated by government to stump up financial support for green transitions. And at that point, we know nothing much other than more profit seeking will eventuate.

Read more
Back To Top