- \n
- Introduction<\/li>\n
- Empirical Trends<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Part 2 The philosophical and analytical framework<\/strong><\/p>\n
- \n
- Why a functioning society needs employment<\/li>\n
- Situating work in the class struggle<\/li>\n
- Is employment a human right?<\/li>\n
- Why work should be sustainable, yielding decent jobs<\/li>\n
- Money as a collective good and the myth of austerity<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Part 3 The march of the robots<\/strong><\/p>\n
- \n
- Robots and outsourcing<\/li>\n
- Should jobs be protected?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Part 4 The role of social institutions<\/strong><\/p>\n
- \n
- The voluntarism con<\/li>\n
- How trade unions need to change<\/li>\n
- Why income support systems can never go broke<\/li>\n
- Minimum wage principles<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Part 5 The curse of labour underutilisation<\/strong><\/p>\n
- \n
- The labour wastage scandal<\/li>\n
- Zero-waste of our youth<\/li>\n
- Taking care of an ageing society<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Part 6 – The future of work<\/strong><\/p>\n
- \n
- What is a real job anyway?<\/li>\n
- Efficiency goes beyond private profit<\/li>\n
- Why basic income is the wrong alternative<\/li>\n
- Full employment and price stability<\/li>\n
- Creating a socially inclusive society<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Marienthal Study<\/h2>\n
The Marienthal study – Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal<\/a> (The Unemployed of Marienthal) – was led by Marie Jahoda<\/a> , Paul Felix Lazarsfeld and, to a lesser extent, Hans Zeisel<\/a> on what happens to a community when it has to endure mass unemployment as a result of a deficiency of overall spending somewhere in the economy.<\/p>\n
It is a cautionary tale for all those who oppose the state taking responsibility for maintaining full employment and for the specific Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) proposal of a Job Guarantee<\/a>.<\/p>\n
I recommend reading the book. I read the English version Marienthal: the sociography of an unemployed community<\/a> (Transaction Publishers, 2002).<\/p>\n
The University of Graz maintains an excellent archival site – The Unemployed Community of Marienthal<\/a><\/p>\n
Marie Jahoda was the classic progressive (she died in 2001) who has been labelled the “Grande Dame of European socialism” having an early association with the Austrian Social Democratic Party, when Vienna was “democratically governed for the first time” after the collapse of the Habsburg monarchy and was referred to as Red Vienna<\/a>.<\/p>\n
She was imprisoned in 1936 by the anti-socialist regime in Austria (which collapsed after the Anschluss by Nazi Germany in 1938).<\/p>\n
Paul Felix Lazarsfeld<\/a> was Jahoda’s Austrian husband at the time and Hans Zeisel<\/a> was a Czech sociologist who undertook postgraduate studies at the University of Vienna.<\/p>\n
Together, they decided to compile a case study of the “socio-psychological effects of unemployment” using the relatively new research techniques of participant observation, which became the norm for empirical social research in the decades that followed.<\/p>\n
The context<\/h2>\n
Austria came out of the First World War as a republic. The dual (Austro-Hungarian) Habsburg monarchy was shattered and the Treaty of Versailles banned Austria from uniting with Germany. The best toys of Australia are possibly in the content of Big W Toy Catalogue<\/a>.<\/p>\n
Inflation was rife in the early 1920s but was curtailed in 1922.<\/p>\n
The conservative Christian Social Party (Roman Catholic), a rural-based political force dominated and ran a strong, anti-socialist state.<\/p>\n
The socialists were dominant in Vienna and the local council did what progressive governments should do – constructed schools and pre-schools, built hospitals and sophisticated housing estates (with rent controls) and developed the city library and information systems.<\/p>\n
Red Vienna became the blueprint for peaceful introduction of progressive (socialist) ideals. A comparison with the political programs of social democrats in Europe these days shows how far these ideals have slipped under the viral neo-liberal infestation.<\/p>\n
Jewish interests were strong within the Social Democrats and this became a source of increasing tension in the late 1920s as anti-semitism became more embedded in European politics.<\/p>\n
The CSP were still in power when the Great Depression emerged. Real GDP growth collapsed and unemployment rose to 25 per cent<\/p>\n
The following graph shows the evolution of annual real GDP growth from 1920 to the onset of the Second World War in 1939. Real GDP fell by 22.5 per cent between 1929 (the peak) and 1933 (from the Angus Maddison Archive<\/a>).<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/billmitchell.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Austria_Real_GDP_growth_1920_1939.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\nGerlich and Campbell (2000) note that “the depression struck the Austrian economy fully in 1930” (p.55) and precipitated “the collapse of a major bank … in May 1931” (p.55). <\/p>\n
They report that the response of the Austrian government was to pursue “a balanced budget and a stable currency” (p.55) which added to the “deflationary pressures” coming from the outside the nation and from the collapse of domestic demand within it.<\/p>\n
They concluded that (p.55):<\/p>\n
\nThe Austrian government neglected the possibilities of public investments for demand-creating purposes, economic policy-making did not follow Keynesian principles. In the years 1931 and 1932 the growth rates dropped sharply …\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
[Reference: Gerlich, P. and D. Campbell (2000) ‘Austria: From Compromise to Authoritarianism’ in Berg-Schlosser, D. and Mitchell, J. (eds), The Conditions of Democracy in Europe, 1919-39: Systematic Case Studies<\/em>, Macmillan, Basingstoke. 40-58. Download Link<\/a>]<\/p>\n
As an aside compare that with Greece’s decline (of around 28 per cent). And Austria resumed growth after 4 years while Greece has been basically held at the trough for nearly a decade now.<\/p>\n
As a result, from 1932 “unemployment grew rapidly, reaching a peak in 1933-6, with between 24 and 26 per cent of the labour force out of work – the unemployment rate among the younger age cohorts was even higher and this produced niches for political radicalization” (Gerlach and Campbell, 2000: 55).<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/billmitchell.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Austria_UN_1920_1939.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\nThe location of the study was the industrial area in Austria, known as Marienthal (Valley of Mary) about 30 kms ESE of Vienna.<\/p>\n
The “factory and workers’ settlement” was in the administrative region of Gramatneusiedl and nearby Neu-Reisenberg.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/billmitchell.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Marienthal.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\nYou can see the layout of the Marienthal textile factory and workers’ living quarters using this MAP<\/a><\/p>\n
The original flax-spinning factory had been revamped in 1864 to become a cotton-spinning mill and was “one of the most successful” of the very bouyant Austrian textile sector.<\/p>\n
Here is the factory in 1910 (copyright History of Sociology in Austria (Graz), \u00bbMarienthal\u00ab Virtual Archives, Georg Grausam picture collection):<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/billmitchell.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Marienthal_Factory_1909.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\nThe study and findings<\/h2>\n
In the period after the First World War, the people of Marienthal had already experienced high unemployment (as the government invoked its currency stability austerity in 1922).<\/p>\n
But by the mid-1920s, the factory was boomed and unemployment was low.<\/p>\n
The decline had started in 1926 when the bank owned by the wealthy Mautner family Neue Wiener Bankgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft collapsed due to a lack of liquidity.<\/p>\n
Isidor Mautner<\/a> who owned the Marienthal textile factory (along with many other textile operations throughout Europe) had used the bank (run by his son Stephan) to fund the working capital of the factory.<\/p>\n
The collapse of the bank, ultimately, precipitated the decline of the factory, but it was the generalised collapse of the Austrian banking system in 1929 associated with the onset of the Great Depression that sealed its fate.<\/p>\n
In September 1929, most of the Marienthal operation was abandoned.<\/p>\n
On December 2, 1930 the Marienthal textile factory was finally shutdown because sales had collapsed as the Great Depression spread. The Depression was the last straw.<\/p>\n
At its peak (1929) it had employed 1,200 workers and an addition 90 salaried staff, which constituted about 75 per cent of the local population.<\/p>\n
As we read in the book (p.ix):<\/p>\n
\nOver the summer of 1929 the factory and all of its companion plants closed down and nearly every family in the small village became affected by unemployment. The big difference from former recessions was the sheer length of time this unemployment lasted. When the researchers first came to Marienthal more than two years after the shutdown of the factory, the situation had not changed at all; it had became even worse.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The closure saw the people quickly descend into poverty and hopelessness.<\/p>\n
The study found that (p.ix):<\/p>\n
\nOnly one out of five families had at least one member earning an income from regular work. Three quarters of the families were dependent on unemployment payments, which were dramatically low at this time … when a dog disappears, the owner no longer bothers to report the loss.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The reference to the disappearing dogs relates to the increasing desperation for food among the local population.<\/p>\n
The Marienthal study sought to investigate the impacts of this economic catastrophe on the people affected. It was funded by the “Federal Chamber of Labour of Vienna and Lower Austria and by the US-American Rockefeller Foundation”.<\/p>\n
Jahoda, Lazarsfeld and Zeisl were working in the private research centre directed by Lazarsfeld – \u00d6sterreichische Wirtschaftspsychologische Forschungsstelle<\/a> (Austrian Research Unit for Economic Psychology).<\/p>\n
The conjectures entertained by the investigation at the time included whether long-term unemployment would lead to a socialist revolt or, instead, lead to social exclusion, isolation and increased passive resignation.<\/p>\n
Interestingly, we read in the Introduction that (p.x):<\/p>\n
\nMarienthal was a stronghold of the Social Democratic Labor Movement. There was a full-fledged Workers’ Library, newspapers were widely distributed and read, participation in the community’s life was strong, many clubs were active and participation in political campaigns and elections was high.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
An interesting observation (especially in the face of some of the modern claims about the freedom joblessness would give people with a basic income guarantee), is that given (p.x):<\/p>\n
\nNearly everything had come to a stop after the closing of the factory … People who should have more time for reading books stopped borrowing them from the library; newspapers were not read as carefully as before, if at all; only organizations offering their members direct financial advantages showed an increase …\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The research process began in November 1931 and ran until “mid-January 1932”<\/p>\n
What did they find?<\/p>\n
1. In terms of the typology of changing attitudes to the unemployment, four specific patterns emerged – “the inner unbroken – the resigned – in despair – the apathetic”.<\/p>\n
We learn that the unbroken family – one which suffered the least from the unemployment (p.53) was best described as on that engaged in the:<\/p>\n
\n… maintenance of the household, care of the children, subjective well-being, activity, hopes and plans for the future, sustained vitality, and continued attempts to find employment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
However, the apathetic families, which were the most impoverished became passive and exhibited hopelessness. They gave up trying to improve their situation.<\/p>\n
Instead of having “plans and hopes for the future”, the unemployment “led to a renouncement of a future that does not even play a role in the imagination”.<\/p>\n
2. The other finding related to this was that as time passed these typical states became transitions in the path to destitution.<\/p>\n
So the “lower the income the more deprived the families reacted”. And those who had previously exhibited hope were worn down by the enduring nature of the calamity and as their resources vanished, their passivity increased.<\/p>\n
This was an important observation given the belief among the Social Democrat activists that “a more active, rebellious reaction to deprivation” would result (p.xi).<\/p>\n
Indeed (p.xi):<\/p>\n
\nMarxists of all branches anticipate the revolution to come after the final breakdown of capitalism. Marienthal provided a telling lesson quite contrary to the conventional wisdom and history itself validated the experience.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
This is an important point and helps to explain why the elites and capital do not mind entrenched levels of mass unemployment. It helps to explain why Greeks who are enduring above 20 per cent unemployment and increasing poverty still support the institutional structure (the common currency) that has created their plight.<\/p>\n
Mass unemployment works for the elites. It demoralises those who are forced by the lack of jobs to endure it. It is not just about the income poverty that results.<\/p>\n
Rather, these attitudinal changes are significant factors which act to discipline the workforce and render it compliant to the wishes and desires of capital.<\/p>\n
3. The study also provided insights in what the authors called the “Meaning of Time” (Chapter 7).<\/p>\n
As the Introduction notes (p.xi):<\/p>\n
\nSomeone from the research group called attention to the fact that men walked more slowly across the main street and stopped more often on their way that women … A conclusion of their … observations was that women were not really unemployed but only unpaid.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
On page 74, we read that “They have the household to run, which fully occupies the day”.<\/p>\n
Interestingly, the authors found that when the men were asked about what they did during the day (p.85):<\/p>\n
\nThe unemployed are simply no longer able to given an account of everything he did during the day.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
They concluded that time and they way it forces the employed persons to divide their time to suit the range of activities they need to fulfill in a day had “lost meaning” to the unemployed.<\/p>\n
Public holidays lost their significance and after the collapse the Marienthal population spent much less time occupied with public events or to volunteer for civic duties.<\/p>\n
In 1933, the authoritarian Austrian government sought to deal with unemployment after their austerity policies had failed. They introduced job creation schemes about which Marie Jahoda would later write in letters to Paul Lazarsfeld (see footnote 3 in the Introduction to the Transaction Edition):<\/p>\n
\nOnly the provision of any work could counter the resignation that comes with unemployment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The political consequences of the unemployment were clearly significant. Jahoda, herself, later noted that rather than emancipate the unemployed into a politicised and active group, the most likely political outcomes would be to push the workers towards right-wing politics<\/p>\n
When I was younger I wondered why the unemployed didn’t take the opportunity to learn things – a new language, a musical instrument etc – given they now had ‘free’ time.<\/p>\n
I was naive. The Marienthal study found the workers overwhelmingly failed to use the freedom from work. Their apathy and dislocation became intensified as time passed.<\/p>\n
Their aspirations collapsed.<\/p>\n
The costs of the unemployment thus went beyond the material losses that a lack of income brings. A job is more than an income, which is as relevant today as it was in the time of the Marienthal study.<\/p>\n
Workers deprived of the capacity to gain employment are simultaneously deprived of social interactions that are important in creating aspiration and hope.<\/p>\n
Time becomes important and motivation increases as a way to deal with competing time uses.<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/h2>\n
The Marienthal study clearly shows that these extra benefits from having work in societies where the majority value work (for more than an income source) are significant.<\/p>\n
The question is whether the findings of such a study remain relevant today. Have societies and values changed to render these observations irrelevant.<\/p>\n
The contention in our book is that no such metamorphosis has taken place. Work is still a central aspect of our lives and value systems.<\/p>\n
Workers deprived of the chance to work exhibit similar dynamics to those trapped in the Marienthal catastrophe in 1930.<\/p>\n
The study raises contemporary issues.<\/p>\n
For example, mass unemployment is a vehicle for class domination – capital over labour. It is no surprise that neo-liberal governments use mass unemployment to entrench their own hegemony.<\/p>\n
They know that from a socio-psychological perspective, prolonged spells of joblessness create passivity – a docile and withdrawn – and divided – labour force.<\/p>\n
They know there is little chance of the unemployed becoming organised and pro-active and becoming a political force to challenge the neo-liberal power base.<\/p>\n
But on the other side, progressives should work to reduce the negative consequences of joblessness. They should provide the frameworks for hope and aspiration that the abandoned and jobless workers quickly lose.<\/p>\n
This is why policies such at the Job Guarantee<\/a> should be at the forefront of progressive activism rather than the passive acceptance that neo-liberal governments deliberately choose to create and maintain mass unemployment as a class discipline.<\/p>\n
Those who advocate basic income seem to believe that just the provision of income will be sufficient to incentivise the jobless into becoming creative beings full of aspiration and productivity.<\/p>\n
Their assumptions work against a huge body of literature, of which the Marienthal study was an early contributor.<\/p>\n
The series so far<\/h2>\n
This is a further part of a series I am writing as background to my next book with Joan Muysken analysing the Future of Work<\/em>. More instalments will come as the research process unfolds.<\/p>\n
The series so far:<\/p>\n
1. When Austrians ate dogs<\/a><\/p>\n
The blogs in these series should be considered working notes rather than self-contained topics. Ultimately, they will be edited into the final manuscript of my next book due out in 2018. The book will be published by Pluto Books in London.<\/p>\n
Advertising – Reclaiming the State: A Progressive Vision of Sovereignty for a Post-Neoliberal World<\/h2>\n
My latest book co-authored with Thomas Fazi will be published by Pluto Press (UK) on September 15, 2017.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/billmitchell.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Front_Cover_Mitchell_Fazi_2017.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n