\t\t\t\tIts my Friday lay day with respect to blog writing but at the risk of today’s publication looking like an advertising catalogue, I thought I have better write something. There are a number of topics I am delving into at present so deciding what I was interested in writing about today took a little coin-tossing (in virtual space that is). So some notes on corporate greed and management lies. Familiar themes for me. In a week where we learned that wages growth in Australia is at record lows and real wages are skating along the zero growth line despite on-going productivity growth, the big business barons want the government to scrap weekend our wage system and instead allow the ‘market’ (inverted commas!) to rip. This is code for cutting wages for a range of occupations and sectors. Business is also continuing to lie about the state of the economy claiming massive skill shortages exist, which then lead them to recommend more lenient use of short-term migrant visas – which is code for bringing in non-unionised workers from abroad who will work for minimum rates and be susceptible to illegal scams that violate those minimum rates. Even the Government has noted the skills shortage argument which is part of the relentless public relations assault on workers’ conditions does not accord with the evidence. But then since when have the right-wing allowed the facts to get in the road of their ideological push to destroy unions and drive wages down as low as they can.
\n<\/p>\n
Last week, I providing some insights into the draft report from the Productivity Commission of Australia on how to reform the Australian industrial relations system – Workplace Relations Framework<\/a> (11.7 mbs).<\/p>\n I noted that the free market biased Commission disappointed couldn’t even find enough flaky evidence to support their conclusions so in the best traditions of the right wing they just offered up the tripe without any coherent argument.<\/p>\n One of the substantive things they recommended was the abolition of special penalty wage rates on Sundays. No real evidence was offered to support the recommendation. There were several other recommendations that amount to attacks on workers pay and conditions.<\/p>\n The on-going narrative promoted by the employer groups who think management is about gaining more real income for profits at the expense of their workforces. They worked out long ago that with persistent mass unemployment, deliberately created by the governments that they ‘fund’ through political donations, that the workers have little power to resist.<\/p>\n However, the Business Council of Australia, which represents the CEOs of the big corporations, was not satisfied. They, of course, were hoping for further major deregulation that would essentially erode the concept of minimum conditions within defined skill definitions.<\/p>\n They are now calling for some national minimum to be established – at some low base set of conditions and pay – and then allow firms to determine the rest (Source<\/a>).<\/p>\n But, this is only in the context of a broad labour underutilisation rate of 15 per cent or more, which clearly operates to suppress the capacity of workers to use ‘market’ power to gain wage and conditions improvements.<\/p>\n The reason the wages growth is at record lows is because the economy is being held in a state of prolonged weakness with rising unemployment and high underemployment.<\/p>\n The employer groups would not be so cocky if there was true full employment and they had to chase labour to work for them. Then they would suddenly be abandon the idea that the ‘market’ should be allowed to determine everything.<\/p>\n That is why they have consistently throughout our history opposed governments that propose maintaining full employment. It is so patent. But the public debate has a capacity to obscure the obvious and segment arguments.<\/p>\n So, with more than 2 million workers (out of a labour force of 12.5 million) underutilised in some way or another (unemployment, underemployment, hidden unemployment), at present one wonders how the employers can get away with their claims that there are massive skill shortages in Australia, which necessitate relaxation of the so-called – 457 visas<\/a> – a visa class that allows employers to bring in allegedly ‘skilled’ workers on short-term contracts.<\/p>\n These visas are majorly rorted by private business. In the blog – Employer group demands free labour from Government<\/a> – I noted that in February 2015, private firms were forced to pay their workforces more than $A23 million in unpaid entitlements after the Fair Work Australia (the wage setting tribunal) conducted some surveillance of pay conditions after complaints were received.<\/p>\n 16,000 workers were found to be underpaid – and were concentrated in cafes, restaurants and pubs, followed closely by construction, the retail trade and service industries like contract cleaning. <\/p>\n These are the same sectors where the employer groups (like the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry) are leading the charge to abandon penalty rates for weekend and public holiday work.<\/p>\n See the video later in this blog for commentary on wages by the CEO of the ACCI.<\/p>\n The number of abused workers is the tip of the iceberg. The only way the Fair Work Australia investigates is if there is a complaint.<\/p>\n There are thousands of overseas workers on the special 457 Visa (temporary workers) who are exploited relentlessly but who will not mostly complain.<\/p>\n The criminal behaviour is concentrated in the already low-pay sector.<\/p>\n An audit by the wage Ombudsman in Australia between September 2013 and June 2014 found that “over 40 per cent of 457 visa holders … [were] … no longer working for their nominated employer” or were being paid well below the minimum wages in Australia (Source<\/a>).<\/p>\n In one case, a workers was being paid $28,000 a year when the minimum legal wage for the classification they were recruited under was $53,900. They were recruited as a “customer service manager” under a supposed skill shortage but was actually engaged in cleaning.<\/p>\n Notwithstanding their rorting behaviour, the Building industry wants more access to foreign workers. The Housing Industry Association recently claimed that there is a major shortage of bricklayers in Australia which will cripple the economy unless more 457 visa workers are allowed in (Source<\/a>).<\/p>\n The Federal Department of Employment produces a document – Skill Shortages – Statistical Summary<\/a> – which was last updated on August 4, 2015.<\/p>\n The opening paragraph says it all:<\/p>\n \nResearch undertaken by the Department of Employment shows that there are more than enough applicants with relevant qualifications, or appropriate skills and experience, for vacancies in almost every occupation.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Which means for those business CEOs who seem to struggle understanding anything – that there are no significant skill shortages in Australia worth talking about.<\/p>\n In terms of the building trades, the Report says that there are 2.2 suitable applicants per vacancy (building professions) and 2.9 for building technicians. In the construction trades there were 1.4 suitable applicants per vacancy.<\/p>\n Note that in the building professions there were 21.6 applicants per vacancy, 26.4 for building technicians and 7.9 for construction trades.<\/p>\n The report goes on to say that:<\/p>\n \n… more than a quarter of skilled vacancies remained unfilled four to six weeks after advertising … The reasons for the unfilled vacancies are varied, but include: no applicants (5 per cent of employers); no suitable applicants (qualified applicants often lacked experience or other attributes employers sought); and employers being unable to agree on the terms and conditions of employment with the preferred candidates.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n No suitable applicants! <\/p>\n The concept of a skills shortage is clearly a relative concept, implying some distance from an optimal state, which begs the question: according to whom.<\/p>\n Unsurprisingly, analyses of skills shortages by industry and governments invariably consider the issue from the perspective of business and profitability, which places the emphasis on containment of labour costs both in terms of wages and conditions, and hence, whenever possible, externalising the costs associated with developing the skills firms require in their workers.<\/p>\n Within this context the notion of structural unemployment arising from so-called ‘skills mismatch’ can be understood as implying an unwillingness of firms to offer jobs (with attached training opportunities) to unemployed workers that they deem to have undesirable characteristics.<\/p>\n When the labour market is tight, the willingness of firms to indulge in their prejudices is more costly. However, when labour underutilisation is high firms can easily increase their hiring standards (broaden the desired characteristics they demand from workers) and the training dynamism driven by labour shortages is lost.<\/p>\n Then we observe, in a static sense, ‘skill mismatches’ which are really symptoms of a ‘low pressure’ economy.<\/p>\n One of the advantages of maintaining full employment is that it introduces what I have called in earlier work I did a dynamic efficiency into the economy. Firms have to be continually offering training and skills development as they create new jobs because otherwise they will not maintain market share.<\/p>\n Workers are moulded to the needs of the job with appropriate skills on an on-going basis.<\/p>\n With mass unemployment, firms get lazy and refuse to offer on-going training. They then cry out that there are skills shortages when, in fact, all they are saying is that they cannot be bothered laying out the resources to train their workers in job-specific skills.<\/p>\n But lurking behind all that is the 457 ruse – which employers know is a way to further undermine domestic wages growth and working conditions.<\/p>\n And, this is all in the context of the Federal government cutting back spending on vocational education (that is, skills training) because it claims it can no longer afford such public outlays. They have largely replaced our excellent training system with a private competitive training model which has also been exposed in recent months as a arena of corruption, cheating and fraud.<\/p>\n You can read more about skills shortages in this Fairfax article (August 14, 2015) – A million people out of work<\/a>.<\/p>\n The ABC news report – Mining boom masked slide in annual wage growth, economists say<\/a> – covered a story I helped with the other day.<\/p>\n It relates to the data I analysed in Wednesday’s blog – Australia wages growth drops to a new record low<\/a>.<\/p>\n The story was also featured on the ABC National Current Affairs TV program 7.30 last night (August 13, 2015). You can view the – Transcript<\/a> – of the segment.<\/p>\n The following video is the complete segment as televised.<\/p>\nABC TV 730 segment on slow wages growth<\/h2>\n