{"id":10060,"date":"2010-06-02T15:38:23","date_gmt":"2010-06-02T05:38:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/billmitchell.org\/blog\/?p=10060"},"modified":"2010-06-02T15:38:23","modified_gmt":"2010-06-02T05:38:23","slug":"australia-gdp-growth-flat-lining","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/billmitchell.org\/blog\/?p=10060","title":{"rendered":"Australia GDP growth flat-lining"},"content":{"rendered":"

\t\t\t\tThe Australian Bureau of Statistics released the March 2010 National Accounts<\/a> data today and it revealed that the Australian economy has grown by 0.5 per cent only in the first quarter of 2010 and the trend is now dead flat. While the Australian economy sidestepped the global economic crisis with just one negative quarter of real GDP growth courtesy of the aggressive fiscal stimulus packages, private sector spending continues to subtract from growth. Private capital formation declined in the March quarter. The current performance of the Australian economy will make any not be sufficient inroads into the high rates of labour underutilisation that remain. The RBA claimed yesterday that economic growth is back around trend but the data shows that is far from the truth. Today’s data confirms that the fiscal contribution was the only reason Australia stayed out of official recession.
\n
\nThe following graph shows the quarterly percentage growth in real GDP from March 2006 to March 2010 (blue columns) and the ABS trend series (red line) superimposed to bring out the fact that the Australian economy is now flat-lining along at around 2 per cent growth per annum if not actually slowing a fraction. In the first 3 months of 2010, quarterly real GDP growth was back below trend.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

The Sydney Morning Herald<\/a> quoted a business economist as saying that:<\/p>\n

\n… the weak private sector investment and housing investment had formed “a bit of an air pocket” in the economy. However, public spending and the household sector continue to expand. “Growth slowed but basically it is still really waiting for the business sector to really pick up momentum … And we’re also waiting for the housing recovery to come through”.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Today’s GDP results confirm what several other data series have been indicating in recent weeks – the Australian economy is going nowhere at present.<\/p>\n

The next graph really shows you what is going on. It shows the percentage contributions to real GDP growth in the March 2010 quarter by aggregate spending type. <\/p>\n

While GDP growth was 0.5 per cent in the March quarter, there was a weakening in private spending. The private sector contribution to growth his overall negative even though household consumption added 0.3 per cent to the bottom line. The graph below shows that residential investment in housing fell (contributing -0.1 to the GDP growth). Private investment fell in the quarter and contributed -0.6 per cent of the GDP growth. So no capacity building has been going on.<\/p>\n

The other notable feature was the fall in exports (contributing -0.1 per cent of the GDP figture). The miners are arguing that the export sector is saving Australia at present. But the data is clear – exports subtracted from growth and net exports (taking into account imports) cut -0.5 per cent from GDP growth.<\/p>\n

Public expenditure on infrastructure and buildings which was a central aspect of the second part of the fiscal stimulus package was the main positive contributor to GDP growth – adding 0.7 percentage points to the figure. If the deficit terrorists had have had their way, and forced a contraction in government spending then the Australian economy would have recorded negative growth in the March quarter 2010.<\/p>\n

Interestingly, the ABS revised the December quarter growth rate upwards which further reinforces the contribution of the fiscal stimulus.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

The following graph shows the quarterly percentage growth in real GDP per capita from March 2007 to March 2010. It grew by 0.1 per cent in the March quarter and confirms that improvement in real living standards is static at present.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Labour market impact<\/strong><\/p>\n

The following graph shows real GDP per hour worked and total hours worked indexes (March 2007 = 100) which provide some clue as to what is going on in the labour market. The economic growth is not driving strong growth in hours worked. Ordinarily this would mean that employment growth should be very flat and unemployment should rise given that the labour force is growing around 1.8 per cent per annum at present.<\/p>\n

The reality is that unemployment is being kept down because productivity growth is fairly slow also and declined in the March 2010 quarter.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Wage share continues to fall<\/strong><\/p>\n

The wage share in factor income is tells us about the direction of real unit labour costs – that is, what each unit of output is costing per real unit of labour input.<\/p>\n

The wage share can fall because the real wage is falling as a result of discretionary policies to deregulate the labour market and attack unions. But, equally, it can fall because the economy is booming and productivity growth is strong.<\/p>\n

The latest estimates for the March quarter 2010, show the wage share fell again by 0.2 percentage points (from 53.6 to 53.4 per cent).<\/p>\n

The following graph shows the evolution of the wage share in national income since March 1976. It shows the continuous redistribution of income from wages to profits which I document as one of the characteristics of the neo-liberal period that led to the current crisis. Please read the blog – The origins of the economic crisis<\/a> – for more detail on this point.<\/p>\n

In historical terms, this redistribution is very large and unprecedented – another atypical behaviour – which the neo-liberals have tried to condition us is just normal. This trend along with the rapid increase in household indebtedness and the obsessive pursuit of budget surpluses are all historically atypical behaviours – which have to be reversed if we are to avoid further crises of the type that has recently crippled the World economy.<\/p>\n

I do not believe that the households can absorb the real output that is being produced by the economy under these distributional trends without having to continually increase their debt levels. Real wages growth has to come back into line with productivity growth to ensure sustainable growth is achieved and this means one thing – there has to be a rather significant shift in the wage share upwards.<\/p>\n

The reality is that this can only be accomplished if real wages growth is allowed to track labour productivity growth. That will require a paradigm shift away from labour market deregulation, anti-labour legislation and trade union bashing.<\/p>\n

I don’t see that happening any time soon and combined with our failure to take a serious position on financial market reform and our obsession with fiscal austerity – it is clear we are setting our economies up for the next crisis. Conservative ideology triumphing over good economics.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Did the Mining sector save Australia?<\/strong><\/p>\n

With the announcement by the Federal Government in the May budget that they are finally going to introduce a 40 per cent resource rent tax (on rents not profits!), the Mining lobby which is a particularly bullying and obnoxious lot have been running nationwide campaigns arguing that they will leave the country and that they saved us from recession.<\/p>\n

The following graph is taken from the ABS Labour Force<\/a> data by industry and shows annual employment growth for the last four quarters for the mining industry and for the nation as a whole. Draw your own conclusions. It isn’t rocket science.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

The external outlook<\/strong><\/p>\n

Australia’s economic fortunes are increasingly tied to China’s growth path. There has been a lot of speculation that China is slowing and in the second-half of 2010 may be in trouble.<\/p>\n

The latest data<\/a> suggests that Chinese manufacturing growth has slowed in the last month in response to weakening domestic and external demand.<\/p>\n

There is also speculation that the Chinese property market<\/a>, which had driven growth via construction is now overheating and economists there are urging the government to raise interest rates to quell demand.<\/p>\n

The news from Europe remains bleak. Here are some headlines that came in this morning via RSS:<\/p>\n